Talk:Micropayment
4 stars based on
33 reviews
A Micropayment Channel or Payment Channel is class of techniques designed to allow users to make multiple Bitcoin transactions without commiting all of the transactions to the Bitcoin block chain.
Several channel designs have been proposed or implemented over the years. This article describes some of them. Many designs are vulnerable to transaction malleability. Specifically, many designs require a micropayment bitcoin wiki to be able to spend an unsigned transaction, in order to ensure that the channel can be opened atomically.
Thus, these designs require a malleability fix that separates the signatures from the part of the transaction that is hashed to form the txid. Micropayment bitcoin wiki in Bitcoin 0. Satoshi Nakamoto described the technique to a Bitcoin developer in a personal email: An unrecorded open transaction can keep being replaced until nLockTime. It may contain payments by multiple parties. Each input owner signs their input. For a new version to be written, each must sign a micropayment bitcoin wiki sequence number see IsNewerThan.
By signing, an input owner says "I agree to put my money in, if everyone puts their money in and the outputs are micropayment bitcoin wiki. The parties hold this tx in reserve and if need be, pass it around until it has enough signatures. One use of nLockTime is high frequency trades between a set of parties. They can keep micropayment bitcoin wiki a tx by unanimous agreement.
The party giving money would be the first to sign the next micropayment bitcoin wiki. If one party stops agreeing to changes, then the last state will be recorded at nLockTime. If desired, a default transaction can be prepared after each version so n-1 parties can push an unresponsive party out. Intermediate transactions do not need to be broadcast.
Only the final outcome gets recorded by the network. Just before nLockTime, the parties and a few witness nodes broadcast the highest sequence tx they saw. This design was not secure: Discussed on the bitcoin-development mailing list [4] and implemented in BitcoinJ, [5] this one transaction to create a secured deposit and a second transaction to release the deposit funds in the manner agreed to by micropayment bitcoin wiki parties, preventing miners from being able to commit a non-final version of the transaction.
However, opening a channel in the Spillman model exposed the depositor to malleability risk where the counter party would be able to hold the depositor's funds hostage. Micropayment bitcoin wiki full description of the protocol is in example 7 of the Contract page. Spillman payment channels are unidirectional there is a payer and a payee, and it micropayment bitcoin wiki not possible to transfer money back in the reverse direction.
Spillman payment channels expire after a specific time, and the receiver needs to close the channel before the expiration. Were made possible in Decemember by the activation of the CLTV soft fork [ citation needed ] after discussion that began in the bitcoin-wizards IRC channel [ citation needed ]moved to the bitcoin-development and bitcoin-dev mailing lists [7]and included a design specification in BIP Like Spillman payment channels, CLTV-style payment channels are unidirectional and expire after a specific time.
Poon-Dryja payment channels were presented in the paper [8] that also introduced the Lightning Network. Channel backing funds are locked into a 2-of-2 multisig, but before the funding transaction is even signed, commitment transactions for each party are first written and signed. As it requires referring to transactions that have not been signed yet, it requires using a transaction format that separates signatures from the part of the transaction that is hashed to generate the txid, such as Segregated Witness.
Poon-Dryja channels may be closed unilaterally requires the participation of only one party or bilaterally requires the participation of both parties.
When closed bilaterally Poon-Dryja channels are indistinguishable on-chain from 2-of-2 multisig address spends. When closed unilaterally, the funds of the party that closed micropayment bitcoin wiki channel is temporarily timelocked; this allows the other party to dispute the state transmitted by the closing party who might have given old state on closing. Poon-Dryja payment channels have indefinite lifetime. Duplex payment channels were micropayment bitcoin wiki in a paper [9] by Christian Decker and Roger Wattenhofer.
This type of payment channel requires the new BIP68 [10] meaning of nSequence. As the name implies, micropayment bitcoin wiki duplex payment channel is composed of two micropayment bitcoin wiki payment channels, one in both directions.
The unidirectional payment channels are essentially Spillman channels, but using relative lock time nSequence instead of nLockTime. However, instead of funding unidirectional payment channels directly from an on-chain funding transaction, there is an "invalidation tree" of off-chain transactions between the funding transaction and the payment channel finalization transactions. The invalidation tree micropayment bitcoin wiki also use relative lock micropayment bitcoin wiki the first version of the transaction has a large relative lock time, and the next version of the transaction which invalidates the first uses a slightly smaller relative lock time, and so on.
There is also a "kick-off" transaction that starts the timeout for the relative locktime. The sequence of transactions is thus: Initially, the invalidation transaction may have a relative lock time of days, and then its outputs go to two unidirectional payment channels, one in either micropayment bitcoin wiki.
Both parties may then use micropayment bitcoin wiki payment channels until one channel is exhausted. The parties may then reset the payment channels, creating a new invalidation transaction with a relative lock time of 99 days that redistributes the money correctly, but with the unidirectional payment channels reset.
The payment channel may be closed at any time by either party without the help of the other by broadcasting the kickoff transaction on the blockchain. In case of such a unilateral close, both parties must wait out the relative lock times until they can broadcast the payment channel finalization transactions. Parties should prefer the bilateral cooperative close, which collapses the kickoff, invalidation tree, and payment channel transactions into a single simple transaction that pays out the funds to both parties.
Duplex payment channels have indefinite lifetime, but there is a limit on number of updates possible due to the invalidation tree. This limit can be multiplied by adding additional layers to the invalidation tree, with resetting of the lower layers. Finally, in case of a unilateral close duplex payment channels require significant wait times and significant number of transactions to be published on the blockchain. The invalidation tree structure may actually have more than two participants; it would be micropayment bitcoin wiki for groups of 3 or more parties to build multiple payment channels between them that are backed by this invalidation tree structure, and to rebalance their payment channels without hitting the blockchain.
Roughly, each update of the channel requires creating two transactions: Thus even if an attacker or disrupter publishes an old update transaction, it micropayment bitcoin wiki get the old state published since the latest transaction can still be published while the CSV-delay on the old settlement micropayment bitcoin wiki hasn't completed yet. Each update transaction's output SCRIPT has an "update" branch that allows any update transaction to spend it, as long as that update transaction has a higher nLockTime than it currently has.
If an old update transaction is spent, it will allow any later update transaction to spend it, thus preventing publication of old settlement transactions. This has the advantage of not requiring a punishment branch unlike Poon-Dryjasimplifying watchtower design and reducing the punishment of accidentally using micropayment bitcoin wiki state which would lead to total loss of funds under Poon-Dryja, but will only lead to wasting of fees in Decker-Russell-Osuntokun.
A technique that can allow payments to be securely routed across multiple payment channels. HTLCs are integral to the design of more advanced payment channels such as those used by the Lightning Network.
Retrieved from " https: Navigation menu Personal tools Create account Log in. Views Read View source View history. Sister projects Essays Source. This page was last edited on 2 Mayat Content is available under Creative Commons Attribution 3. Privacy policy About Bitcoin Wiki Disclaimers.
