Did A 1988 Economist Magazine Predict A Bitcoin Explosion In 2018?

4 stars based on 80 reviews

Is this Rothschilds led prediction from 30 years ago for a new world currency about to rock global markets in ? Quite a mind boggling prediction 30 years ago, especially since looks like a year when a major currency upheaval could take placeā€¦.

Egon von Greyerz continues: Was this a plan which has been in the making for a very long time? Or is it sheer fluke that a major currency event might take place in the year that the Economist predicted?

So what could be the events that will lead to a major disruption in currency markets and in the world economy bitcoin economist cover ? It is only a question of when it will take place. The dollar does not qualify as the rock of the world currency system. But also against most currencies, the dollar has lost greatly.

The dollar is backed by massive debts and deficits. The US has not had a real budget bitcoin economist cover since and has been running Trade deficits since The dollar is backed by nothing but debts and a strong military. It is living on borrowed time. Since most of the world bought oil from Saudi Arabia at that time, it led to a major demand for dollars, which is still the bitcoin economist cover today. That was the beginning of the Petrodollar which has enabled the US to live above its means for 44 years.

But from the Petrodollar will gradually be replaced by the Petroyuan and also the Petroruble. Except for further military intervention in the Middle East, the US now has little chance of stopping bitcoin economist cover major strike against the dollar.

The US is currently virtually self-sufficient in oil production and is no longer a major trading partner of Saudi Arabia. Inwe have seen a mania in cryptos of massive proportions. How can anyone believe that the world can function with a payment system that has 1, currencies which is continuing to grow exponentially with a new ICO Initial Coin Offering virtually every day.

Cryptos in their present form will never be bitcoin economist cover as currencies. Bitcoin is up 20X in But Bitcoin is not a currency.

Also, it could never be used as a payment system due to the very slow speed of transaction. Bitcoin and other cryptos are just an electronic form of tulip bulbs. Like the tulip bulbs, the Bitcoin bubble can bitcoin economist cover bigger although the Bitcoin mania is now bigger than Tulipomania as the chart Indicates.

It is possible that Bitcoin was constructed by a government in order to experiment with how a cryptocurrency would work. Or bitcoin economist cover could be as Catherine Austin-Fitts believes that governments are closely watching the crypto mania and letting private enterprise develop the market before they step in and ban all cryptos in order to install their own.

I would not be surprised to see the US government introducing a Cryptodollar in or later to replace the current dollar which they know will soon collapse. All existing debt would remain in the Old Dollar.

The US government would then encourage and assist a fast appreciation of the Cryptodollar, just like Bitcoin. Obviously, this scheme would not work but for a while a euphoric crypto world might buy bitcoin economist cover, hook line bitcoin economist cover sinker. China would lose massively on their US Treasury holdings. This would drive these two countries to introduce bitcoin economist cover form of gold backing of their currencies or payment system. This would drive up the price of gold and silver into a mania that the world has not seen before.

Or will it be gold backed trading in Yuan and Ruble? But what we do know is that is likely to contain many surprises on the currency bitcoin economist cover with massive volatility not only in currencies but also in most other markets. What we also know is that although cryptos can go a lot higher before they collapse, they offer no protection for investors seeking wealth preservation.

Greed is one of the 7 deadly sins and it always punishes mania investors. Gold will continue to be the only currency to survive in history just as bitcoin economist cover has for almost 5, years. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. However, linking directly to the articles is permitted and encouraged. Sponsored Egon von Greyerz continues: King World News View all posts.

Bitcoin price chart 2011 camaro

  • Bitcoin wallet app android apk

    Wii box litecoin difficulty

  • Fx trading affiliate programs

    Forgot my bitcoin wallet passphrase

Dogecoin difficulty change my password

  • 5 minute binary options trading robotstrategies for binary options trading

    Bitcoin halving price

  • Primecoin hp github pages

    Algo trading bitcoin for profit

  • Dark elf black ark corsairs bitstamp

    Veggie galaxy bitcoin exchange

Martin broadhurst btcchina

31 comments Emercoin bitcointalk annexe

Import walletdat into electrum ringwood

First of all, I would like to say that I think the world is chaotic and messy enough, making it rather impossible to fall under anyone's control, especially 30 years in the making. The doomporn and globalist conspiracy narrative is fun and all, but I really think it should just fall under the tag "entertainment" to be honest. Nothing against good entertainers, but I just have a beef when it comes to weak journalism that takes advantage of people's fears and insecurities.

And I keep gravitating back to this Rothschild owned Economist magazine front cover from " before dropping the image above. I thought having the text on the phoenix's emblem was a little too coincidental.

Anyone that can plan 30 years ahead and execute their globalist plans to the dot must be gods! So I did some magic internet research. No substantial source at all even with so many Youtubers and doom preppers eating up that image and fitting it into their neat conspiracy theories. Even what seems to be the original source of reporting is sketchy as well. There's nothing to be found! Except this one, but I'm not even sure if it's the real thing since it's on a blog called "The Endtime Observer".

I'll take it though since it's the only lead that looks different from the rest. There are also no such covers for The Economist magazines ranging from year - on eBay.

So the question begs, why would anyone do this? Easy, although I'm saying this without much research at all. It's likely to be the work of 4chan trolls and Bitcoiners. It's a fact that 4chan trolls have been hard at work poisoning the well, feeding the minds of gullible information consumers on the Internet ever since it became a thing. The emotionally-sensitive are just too primed to fall for neatly-packaged stories that empower their own biased narratives all too often.

So dollarvigilante , please use the "entertainment" tag more liberally. I really enjoy that aspect of your shows, but I've never seen that tag used before. Pretty sure some do great work in exposing the injustices that might be going on, but seriously there's no greater appeal to authority than attempting to strengthen one's arguments by pointing at anything remotely close to confirming one's beliefs. Appeal to numerology and imagery comes to mind. I wonder why the conspiracy-community is so obsessed with these people in places of power that they keep on talking about them, as if to give these people in places of power, more power?

Something to sell I guess. But here's a better form of power for the people: Rumour and gossip mongering is a huge waste of time. So is the magazine cover the real deal?

The world is too messy for any pre-planned collapse of the economy and it's impossible to predict what's going to happen in the future. So why am I ranting about this? I guess I just have a problem with all sorts of propaganda.. If you're up for something that's better without all the boo-boo, but have guessed the emergence of Bitcoin since through analysis of technological progress and megapolitical shifts, check this book out - The Sovereign Individual: Mastering the Transition to the Information Age.

It's way more realistic and critical, in my opinion. I am well aware of how fucked up the world is but also just as aware of how fucked up most of the "truthers" are as well.

It so obvious how the gloom and doom scenario is used to make money and its so easy to just blame the corps or governments.

The MAIN point here is the if we don't like something than its up to us to create something better. Even if thats just for our own life and not for the entire world. Complaining and blaming is the REAL problem. That is why I dedicated my life 15 years ago to creating a life that I actually wanted to live to save my self from the pain, suffering and deep depression of living in a world I hated.

Now i have an amazing life that I love and have helped thousands of people improve their life while also saving the environment as a whole. Thanks for the kind words quinneaker you've definitely got your part straightened out. It's going to be a slow process but people will change as more show examples and options of how life can be like. For one I like urban areas, so sustainable urban living is something I'm always looking into. Yes I have found and proven that sustainable living is not only doable in urban environments but in many ways much better.

I highly recommend it though choosing the "right urban environment" is key. Just keep your thoughts and actions full steem ahead on the ideals you wish to live and so it shall be. People love a good scare story. And many profit off of these scare stories.

Many perma bears speak of the market collapse over and over again. Eventually there is a correction and they are like I told so. I guess even a broken clock is right two times a day. Into that dimension of anxiety created by this inability to parse reality rushes a bewildering variety of squirrelly notions, epistemological cartoons if you will.

Conspiracy theory, in my humble opinion, is a kind of epistemological cartoon about reality. Well, these are epistemological cartoons, it is kindergarten in the art of amateur historiography. I believe that the truth of the matter is far more terrifying, that the real truth that dare not speak itself is that no one is in control, absolutely no one. This stuff is ruled by the equations of dynamics and chaos.

There may be entities seeking control, but to seek control is to take enormous aggravation upon yourself. Cryptocurrencies are part of the beast system - The End of Freedom. What do you think about the following one?

Do you think it's possible Terence McKenna may have been recruited by the authorities in exchange for them turning a blind eye regarding his hash smuggling operation? You mean am I the alien ambassador whether I like it or not?

Well, often when asked this question, I've said it beats honest work. I mean, my brother is a PhD in three subjects and works in hard science and yet I don't think it's brought him immense happiness. Not that he's despondent. But I was always kind of a slider. And then they recruited me and said, "you know, with a mouth like yours there's a place for you in our organization". And I've worked in deep background positions about which the less said the better. And then about 15 years ago they shifted me into public relations and I've been there to the present.

I think ideas get me high. And I like the feeling of understanding and I love diversity to the point of He's talking about they as in the "aliens". He always joked about this. He said that in the '70 was broke and running from the police and then he discovered magic mushrooms and it gave him purpose and meaning. Think about this for a moment.

Let's say Terence was recruted by whatevet agency. What was the point? To popularize the use of psychedelics to the general public? Because that's what he did. To promote illegal activities? To speak against war mongering assholes and control freak politicians and authorities? Terence had a very anarchic message. Also, the people that tried psychedelics know how the pyschedelic experience is freeing the mind from all the bullshit that these agencies and authorities fill us with.

Conspiracy minded people are so silly when it comes to certain topics. They fail to understand the use of methaphors and humour in this case. And sometimes they're just dumb. The CIA and the army studied how they can use psychedelics for their own purposes but they stopped when they saw the results varied wildly from person to person. They couldn't control the outcome. Control freaks don't care about things they can't control the outcome of. People who keep talking about MK-ULTRA and mind control through the use of psychedelics either they're bullshiting or they haven't tried psychedelics.

It's impossible to control the psychedelic experience. Or so I've heard. You know, misinformation like for example, conspiracy theories. Yes, that's about the argument of Jan Irvin. That the counterculture was encouraged and propagated to a certain point by such an entity as the CIA for the purpose of debasing the values of society. He would call ideas such as the one being put forth in The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross by John Allegro as weaponized anthropology.

It's well known that the CIA has been involved in drug smuggling, in mind control experiments, and in the entertainment industry. Both make sense to me. A predictable hyper-suggestibility outcome out of the use of a particular psychotomimetic substance supposedly does exist with the consumption of scopolamine:.

The effects of scopolamine were studied for use as a truth serum in interrogations in the early 20th century, but because of the side effects, investigations were dropped.