In January,The Economist published a prediction of a world currency and it's front cover contained an image of a gold coin around the neck of a phoenix that looks suspiciously like Bitcoin's logo - the date on the coin is the economist bitcoin 1988 Given that predicting a 'one world currency' is not a particularly difficult thing to do, we might just put this down to a meaningless, chance occurrence - however, as many have observed - the real controllers of our society's political and financial systems don't really do 'leaving things to chance'.
THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries, and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency.
Prices the economist bitcoin 1988 be quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let's say, the phoenix. The phoenix will be favoured by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today's national currencies, which by then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the last twentieth century.
First of all, it is very common for people the economist bitcoin 1988 be led to think they are being 'saved' by an idea or a person, but to then be led into destruction. This occurred with communism, representational democracy and is perhaps personified by Russell Brand as he plays the 'pied piper' - who says some of the right things but ultimately is easily shown to be leading people to dead ends.
If we are going to improve life, we need to understand that we are being heavily manipulated in ways that hugely limit, in subtle ways, our ability to be free and successful. It is possible to take great ideas and corrupt them so that they work against us, just as has occurred with world religions which preach love and liberation but which often produce guilt and suffering. My recent the economist bitcoin 1988 in response to Jeff Berwick's interview with a core developer of Bitcoin Cash went some way to putting across my position on the subject and it is clear that there are important questions that need to be asked about the nature of Bitcoin and who exactly is controlling it.
Thankfully, since the code can and has been forked, it the economist bitcoin 1988 possible for any poor leadership to be made irrelevant simply by creating a new, better version. That said though, I'd like to draw your attention to two very important videos beyond the ones linked in this post already that show something of how world events are planned well in advance and clues are left 'hidden in plane site' often DECADES in advance.
To the untrained eye, the economist bitcoin 1988 idea of predictive programming seems insane and paranoid. If you poke me in the belly hard and cause me the economist bitcoin 1988, without any warning, I might be in a bit of shock and retaliate due to my programmed defence conditioning. If, however, you show me videos of you poking me in the belly simulated for a few days before the event, I will be much less shocked and less likely to lash out. If you show me the videos in such a way that I don't even notice you showing me them - for example, by having the video playing in the background of the room while you mostly direct me to look elsewhere; I may be desensitised primed for the event without the economist bitcoin 1988 realising the priming has occurred.
This is one aspect of the economist bitcoin 1988 programming' and there are more that make it attractive to those who desire control. There are a few very good videos available that expose this topic, but here are a couple that offer alternative angles on all this that are particularly attention grabbing. This is a long recording, but it's hard to stop listening once the details of the situation being described become clearer:.
To conclude, this could all just be a 'coincidence', but given the methodologies of covert control described here, it is not beyond a the economist bitcoin 1988 of the imagination to think that Bitcoin was subtly inserted into our mental matrix long ago, to quietly rest in the unconscious collective minds of the children and younger people from the time the publication was made.
Perhaps those people will be programmed to unconsciously connect together 'Bitcoin' with the idea of a single, world currency and be more open to it due to old connections having been formed that aren't really thought about and acknowledged. For this and many the economist bitcoin 1988 reasons I think it is quite important to pay close attention to those controlling the Bitcoin CORE network and to see whether Bitcoin CORE is headed towards a liberated, reliable system of exchange or the economist bitcoin 1988 it is headed towards a banker driven and unliberated system of control dressed up as something more than it is Vote ura-soul for Steem Witness!
View My Witness Application Here. If you understand how time works, the cycles are very apparent. Like, the rots-children tried to take credit for the feminist movement, however, they were just trying to steer an energy the economist bitcoin 1988 was much larger than them. And, unfortunately for men, and even more so for women, it worked.
Today, there is a push for a more central, far better currency. It couldn't have been done without the large the economist bitcoin 1988 force trying to pull it into being. So, the banksters would like to control this currency. However, humanity is demanding transparency and integrity in their currency. So, even if the bad guys are behind bitcoin, they will not win, as any choice that doesn't have transparency and integrity will simply be abandoned.
We also have a long way to go probably less than a decade in figuring out how to work with certain areas have trade imbalances and other such giant problems. And after someone does something akin to thinking up the block-chain, the solution will seem rather simple.
The collective power of humanity is greater than that of the relatively tiny groups of empire builders who seek to control life everywhere.
That said, if we succumb to being at the whim of any systems, then there will always be attempts made to control the system and thus the people involved. Transparency and integrity are key, yes - it is necessary now to really help everyone learn all they can about the reality here and the concepts involved to ensure the most intelligent decisions are made.
Dan Larimer isn't really a genius in inventing new things. He has been a genius in getting those things created. I envisioned steemit and bitcoin-like barter long ago. As did many others. The trick has always been to get the economist bitcoin 1988 development and enough publicity to get the thing to point where it will live on its own.
Dan Larimer also has the inenviable position to the economist bitcoin 1988 to explain these things so the economist bitcoin 1988 normal people might grasp and utilize them. I tried to explain to a person what EOS and Ethereum was, and they thought I was talking about running a program on someone else's computer.
So interesting to think about. I seem to recall other eerily predictive Economist covers. I am impressed by this article and wish we would see more like it on steemit. Unfortunately I do believe that Blockchain was planned and it is not what people thing as far as a revolutionary was to stand up to the man. The fact they they allow it to continue is enough to prove that.
Mark of the beast! Unfortunately most Christians are never taught about this and instead are told the false teaching of "We will all fly away" sad and dangerous times indeed This is all of concern, yes. Even if it was not planned, this, like most technology can be used for destructive purposes.
A knife can kill or help heal - it's always our intentions that make the difference. I don't know will btc be an economic miracle for the world to finish the intermediaries or a project that will increase income inequality.
Thank you for the poke in the stomach. Very interesting conjectures, well and thoughtfully presented. I look forward to more. Back to the future is an amazing sequence of encodings IMO. It arguably demonstrates the use, possible, of remote viewing or even technology that could view the economist bitcoin 1988 into the future, to then plan out a series of movies. Alternatively, it is a blueprint for events that were planned back then and desired to be brought into manifestation. It could very well be both!
I think in the end we will be using gold and silver as currency of the next. I have seen the Back to the future thing I was a huge fan of the films and can see this in it. I have also seen the Economist cover but Bitcoin the economist bitcoin 1988. And it kinda make sense mad and maddening. Is it good or bad the mind boggles but as the collective consciousness the economist bitcoin 1988 can make it a good thing!
Very interesting read with a lot of good information about what might be ahead of us for a one world currency. Subliminal suggestions being played in the back ground. Very powerful tools of suggestion. If cryptocurrency was any threat to the system, laws would be made, people jailed or suicided.
It would be very hard to believe, that poor The economist bitcoin 1988. Rothschild watches in horror as his power disappears without taking action. Bitcoin is a great opportunity to move the sheeple into a cash less society and maybe have a sweet little transfer of wealth in the process. Too Good Too Be True crypto I'm still playing along but I believe it is. Money itself was created by these jerks in these bloodlines that reach all the way back to Sumer.
Do we really think some magic anonymous person created crypto? THAT is magical thinking in my opinion. Thanks for the great post. Always so, money makes money, blood and sweat makes more blood and sweat.
That's the way of things. From what i have read the blockchain is a crucial part of the transhumanisum. Its looking like it has been a long planned out thing. Further back than most can imagine. Bitcoin is doing a good job of blazing the trail, so far. This makes happy that I'm a steemian. Let's create a much better platform than Barry Zuckerkorn did! I thought this too but, wouldn't it be programmed to be more centralized if this was true?
Bitcoin cash itself is pretty decentralized and appears to provide a measure of protection against the violence of authority so why would it start there? BTW great video and post, resteemed! Here's a quote the economist bitcoin 1988 this edition of The Economist: Why Does This Matter? Is Bitcoin Really a Trap? Predictive Programming To the untrained eye, the idea of predictive programming seems insane and paranoid. Videos That May Demonstrate Predictive Programming In Broad Daylight There are a few very good videos available that expose this topic, but here are a couple that offer alternative angles on all this that are particularly attention grabbing.
The film series 'Back to the future' appears to be a heavily encoded set of movies which play with actual real world 'time travel' by describing events that were to transpire years after the movies were made.
The events in question are largely the attacks in New York.
NEO is a major cryptocurrency (2. I have been a very loyal user for sometime but this was the last straw for me personally. Bitcoin Price Falls 11 after China Bans Initial Coin Offerings.