Block explorer primecoin high performance
Replace transaction merkle tree with a Merkle-sum-tree. This allows SPV nodes to stochastically validate the subsidy in blocks by fetching a random leaf and then fetching its txins. This way if you have a stream of utxo queries coming in, you can make the work of them mine for you.
Validation then, is block explorer primecoin high performance. If you don't have enough queries coming in you just make some up at random. Represent the script as a merklized abstract syntax tree. The P2SH address is the root. When spending the spender only may provide only the branch they are executing, and hashes for the unexecuted branches. This increases privacy and can compress long block explorer primecoin high performance on spend.
Pruned history Structure transactions so that the parts needed for validation txins, scriptsigs are separate from the output data scriptpubkey, output and fee values and put them in separate hash trees. All nodes block explorer primecoin high performance prune all data more than a few thousand blocks back.
Massive space savings and improvements in syncup speed. Massive security loss— an attacker that can construct a large reorg can steal all the transacted coin beyond block explorer primecoin high performance certain depth. Normative and committed merklized UTXO data structure allows full validation of current blocks by storageless nodes with SPV security Can be complimented by proof-of-misbehavior messages block explorer primecoin high performance show a block is invalid by packing up the tree fragments that provide the data needed to see its invalidity.
ZKP Validated checkpoints— Is it possible to use computational integrity to create compact constant size checkpoint proofs that show that a checkpoint was the result of a block explorer primecoin high performance validation of the blockchain? This could be used to give pruned history the same security as full Bitcoin up to the limitations of the integrity proofs.
Chain folding If nodes don't actually need to validate old chain data because of committed UTXO and pruned historyit would be possible to 'fold up' the historic chain: Nodes which are validating just to gauge difficulty can skip the intermediate blocks. This can be applied recursively. If the backpointers are randomized and every block is a candidate summary you end making the chain a merklized skiplist.
Alternatively, do not store a UTXO set. Instead encode the transactions outputs in the blockchain in a merkle mountain range an insertion ordered fully populated binary tree, setup to make appends cheap over the whole chain.
Transactions are required to provide the update proofs that show their inputs in the tree and thus also allow you to null them out. This means that fully validating nodes and miners can be basically storageless, but wallets must take on the cost of remembering their own coins. A transaction is mined but it isn't clear which inputs its spending.
Fees are paid by unblinded inputs to prevent DOS attacks. Blinding is done in such a way that double spends are still obvious. If full nodes become expensive to operate in the future then they may become uncommon and this could compromise the security of Bitcoin. This risk can be reduced if it's made possible for Bitcoin nodes to check all the rules at random and transmit compact proofs of rule violations.
If this is done even if there is only one honest full node in the world the system is secure so long as it can communicate to all others. In general, in any deterministic computation process if you have simple state updates and commit to the sequence of states a compact proof of invalidity can be generated by producing a hash tree fragment to the first invalidate state transition. Ideas in this space have been previously discussed under the banner of proof-of-treachery [1].
Right now not all of the rules can be checked randomly or have compact proofs. SPV header checks — time, target, difficulty, already have them. But if future SPV nodes don't really check all the headers in the future it may be useful to arrange old header times in a merkle mountain block explorer primecoin high performance to proofs of sum difficulty and compact proofs of incorrect difficulty.
Proof of invalid script Possible in the current system: Proof is tree fragments for the invalid txn in question as well as one invalid input no need to include more block explorer primecoin high performance one.
Could be made more efficient by including commitments to intermediate states, but with the opcode limit all scripts are compact block explorer primecoin high performance verify in Bitcoin without doing anything fancier. Block explorer primecoin high performance proves nlocktime, etc. To prove output value greater than inputs all inputs must be provided in the proof.
Proof of double spend Possible in the current system: Proof is tree fragments for the two transactions which block explorer primecoin high performance the same input. Proof of false inflation Not possible without more data: The coinbase payment is the sum of fees in a block and the subsidy. Fees require knowing the transaction's inputs output values, to check subsidy you must not only have all the transactions but all their inputs as well.
Nodes can randomly check this by grabbing a random txn block explorer primecoin high performance checking its inputs, and compactly prove violation by showing where the fees don't match their commitments. Proof of block too large Similar to false inflation, requires all the transactions, can similarly be solved by including the sum of txn sizes in the tree.
Proof of spending a non-existing input Requires additional data: Proof is a pair of tree fragments for the higher and lower records for the missing entry, and another pair for the outputs block explorer primecoin high performance within a block but consumed. I think you can even pull that off as a soft-fork I get your point, sometimes just trust-less is enough I think the big question is do you need the self-modifying code that forth makes possible?
IE things like SPV-verifiable colored coins I think it makes most sense when the block explorer primecoin high performance pow is in tx's, although exactly what that'd look like is an interesting question I'd still be in favor of improving things generally, e.
What I'd do is just implement a generic snark validation, and providing the snark verification key in the transaction. Though I'm not aware of any way to block explorer primecoin high performance that which we'd consider in scope for this discussion. I propose that if our choice operator s are good then a maximally efficient winternitz signature will be completely natural.
Block explorer primecoin high performance public key is just the root hash over this data. So, is there a way with ECDSA, given three messages pick a pubkey,r,s such that pubkey,r,s is a valid signature of any one of the three messages?
I think the most fundemental thing I've discovered is the concepts of how mining can be separated into timestamping and proof-of-publication Is it back in your possession now?
What if that data has been further split into multiple parts with an error correcting code and spread to multiple machines. Now where does the coin reside? But there is no need that the best analogies need to be physically intutive, in fact basically all of higher mathmatics is about manipulating abstractions which are in no way physically intutive. I think relating to a payments ability to require transferable restrictions on the next transaction.
But make the covenants temporary, the coins themselves perishable, or applied to user issued assets not colored coins but separately issued assets a la freimarketsand it is a different story IMHO.
Some of your competition doesn't mind disclosing this however. I think they should just take the scheme we discussed previously and execute it under a ZKP for general programs. It would be similar in size to the zerocash proofs. Verifer does this too. Both prover and verifier get a hash root. The verifyer verifies the signature and the zkp.
But it shouldn't be terrible. I believe it would be cheaper than another sha hash in any case. Or of an encrypted value or. I think not, at least not block explorer primecoin high performance the GGPR12 stuff as the arith circuit field size is set by the size of the pairing crypto curve. You could get more elaborate, like timelocking the funds and show that funds beyond the withdraw daily limits are actually unspendable by the network, but perhaps I'm getting to cipherpunk there. I'm thinking for a merklized AST what makes sense is merklized forth.
The forth dictionary concept is perfect for it, and means you have a simple, easy to implement language already used for embedded andother things and bitcoin scripting along with all the usual nice things like editor modes and what not So you've got your parameter stack and return stack, and are thus at the point where you can recreate Bitcoin scripting. Now the interesting thing to do is add TPM functionality, which means a PCR opcode and stack to allow you to select what you want to consider as the start of the current trusted block of code.
Then add an encrypted stack, as expected encrypted with H sec PCR tipand some sort of monotonic counter thing. That should give you enough to do trusted computing with an extremely stable API, and that API block explorer primecoin high performance can be just AST block explorer primecoin high performance of useful library function calls that may actually be implemented directly in C or whatever rather than the opcodes themselves.
I don't know that explicitly supporting that makes sense. Equally, forth is already common in applications, IE spacecraft, where you need relatively bare metal languages with simple frameworks and symantics; note how with forth it's much easier to get to the level where you trust that the code being run is what you actually wrote than, say, C.
Equally, forth is already common in applications, IE spacecraft, where you need relatively bare metal languages with simple frameworks and symantics; note how with forth it's much easier to get to the level where you trust that the Just be clear what the maximum's are for the variou parts of the stack.
Dunno yet what the stack datatype should be, MPI's are nice but there is the subtle issue that it'd be good to have some clear idea of how many operations an operation takes.
Of course, really simple would be bit ints and implement everything higher level in forth. Maybe a merkle mountain range of every value ever associated with a given key?
I mentioned to TD earlier today the idea of miners committing to a merkle tree of txids in their mempool, just to prove visibility, you could use that if the commitment included txins being spent. Appending needs to touch only the "mountain tips", that is the perfect merkle block explorer primecoin high performance already stored, and for n items stored you'll have log2 n trees.
I've got an idea where you'd make transactions have commitments of previous ones with a merkle-mountain-range-like scheme so you could efficiently reference any previous transaction up to the genesis block. This is easiest to understand if transactions can only have linear history, but a dag history is doable too. Anyway, wallet software would receive that history to know the coins are valid, thus pushing validation directly to the users. Obviously some way of pruning that history is important, SCIP is heavy-weight and complex but could work.
So one possible accumulator would be to construct a merkle tree of a bit field with one block explorer primecoin high performance for every integer between 0 and 2 You can prove you added an integer to that set by showing the leaves for an operation updating the appropriate bit, and you can remove an integer with another set of leaves.
With primecoin GPU miners finally being released, I am hoping for a surge in the popularity of this coin. I think I am going to get a couple cards mining this. If I break even I will consider it worthwhile because it is a more innovative coin and deserves to be one of the better alts. I will post any results here.
I see what they did there: I assume it's becasue you need a license no? Or is it just my internet again? I reserved a couple miners, but I am really having second thoughts.
My 's are in two different rigs that are headless and I don't really want the hassle of maintaining multiple miners on remote machines. Plus I don't know if I will ever earn back what they are charging for the miner. I think I am going to wait. I think that they will have to drop the price to sell many more.
I wonder if they licensed ivan for a machine or each individual card as well. I am also curious to watch the difficulty. I am aiming to break even on my initial investment, but hoping for more. I am not sure it is going to happen, but we shall see. I will update with results and numbers. I am going to try it on x's because that is most convenient for me. I just checked and have already found a block. I hope I can get my initial purchase back before difficulty goes over Well if it keeps this up you should.
Nice to see a GPU miner finally, but I'm not sure it's worth it for the smaller guys. Might take a while to ROI. I thought I posted about it, but I guess my phone ate it.
There is a ypool primeminer if anyone wants to try it. It was just announced today I think. There is discussion around page 20 of this thread. The primegpu guys are giving partial refunds and lowering the price for this to 35xpm. Also purchase limit is removed. Looks like the big farms may get in on it. Watch for raising difficulty. Here is the mega link for it. Doesn't sound better than any other coin at the current value.
I guess if people start mining maybe the value will go up and those that got in at 1. You'd need cards per rig for best results, or a few rigs pointed to one wallet as the server. The ypool version is free I think. For x the I got a couple blocks today, but one is strange.
It had a Also it wasn't a 10 chain. Primecoin client says it has blocks until confirmation, so it does have some confirms. Will it reject it after the blocks confirmation or do they usually show up as reject before that? It was strange that it mined right as I restarted the client Hmmm, might be an orphan Spotted your user at btctalk: I thought you would have figured that out already, though, I never did come right out with it.
I like solo mining, so I'm sticking to that Are you still running this on the free license you got Ivan? I still need to find 2 blocks before I have earned back my purchase price, but blocks have come well the last 24 hrs. So I am probably still behind if you count what I would have earned mining elsewhere for the last few days.
Hopefully a x improvement will come soon. Put'er back in, you are essentially solo mining XPM with that miner. Yes you are solo mining. I would run the for xpm. The miner is tuned for the When solo mining you have to wait longer for blocks, but the payout is a whole block, which is about 9 xpm. Did you pay for the license, and how many GPUs did you pay to run? It covers one gpu, you can change it to the x for free, just create a new hardware ID and send it to the developer.
I'd reccomend mining with both cards to find blocks, otherwise it'll take much longer with just one Then run it, and run the prime-gpu client. Let it mine for a while, and check the Block counter in the server. I'd reccomend getting a second license for the x and mining like that, otherwise solo mining will be slow.
Ok, the devs are working on a private pool for guys like you. Ask them to renew the license based on the new hardware ID you'll get when you run the x. It's a LOT faster at xpm with this miner. I have more than recovered the cost of the miner, as long as all of my mined blocks mature. I think that profitability will be ok for this, though difficulty is rising. I got 37 xpm after 4 days mining with 2 cards and never even mined for more than 16hs straight.
Just have the primecoin. Wait for a block and that's about it. First time you run it it'll generate a username and pw for the primecoin. I used that one, not sure if necessary though. You can check the balance without closing the miner using "primecoind listtransactions" or "primecoind getbalance" using command prompt. I think, by memory. Supercomputing, another more well known dev has an nvidia miner already and will release his by the 1st of July.
Solo will earn just as much as pool, you just have to make sure it is running right. On solo you will earn a block at a time, which is about 9xpm. It's worth it though, rewards are much larger than a pool. You have a x no? I'd solo with it. I think you should find about one block per day with a single x, but it will go down as difficulty goes up. Ihavent found one today either. I have 3 x running it. It all averages out when on solo though, you are relying on luck, but luck should even out if you do it long enough.
What is your cpd and time numbers at? Found 2 ch today, one block last night, and four blocks before that in 3 or 4 days. Will probably find one or two in a few hours. Give it time, it might take a few more hours, but if you mine for a week non stop you'll probably get at least blocks.
I looked at a calculator the other day, I think it said that Where did i see the calculator for profitability? Total xpm so far: I assume you are holding planning for xpm to go up? That's pretty decent overall quick math 72x0.
Yup, something like that I sold a few coins since I needed money for the rent, but the rest I'm holding, same as my vtc and some doge. You can try cpuusage from 1 to Overclocking my once pitiful i to 3. Yeah, no cpu coins out there Not sure if it is just a luck thing, but I seem to be getting better results with 8 CPU usage instead of 9.