Wolf, head Icon Free
5 stars based on
58 reviews
Many recent user agents such as graphical browsers and newsreaders display them as a visual reminder of the Web site identity in the address bar or in tabs. To add a favicon to your Web site, you'll need both an image and a method for specifying that the image is to be used as a favicon.
This document explains the method preferred by W3C for specifying the favicon. There is robot head profile icon common method that is illustrated below, with an explanation of why that method is inconsistent with some principles of Web architecture.
This document does not discuss in detail how to create a favicon image. However, the format for the image you have chosen must be 16x16 robot head profile icon or 32x32 pixels, using either 8-bit or bit colors. The first approach for specifying a favicon is to robot head profile icon the rel attribute value "icon" and to define what the value means via a robot head profile icon ; profiles are discussed in more detail below.
In this HTML 4. A second method for specifying a favicon relies on using a predefined URI to identify the image: This method works because some browsers have been programmed to look for favicons using that URI. To summarize the issue: The Web architecture authorizes site managers to manage their URI space for a given domain name as they see fit. Conventions that do not represent community agreement and that reduce the options robot head profile icon to a site manager do not scale and may lead to conflict since there is no well-known list of these predefined URIs.
One practical consideration illustrates the problem: These users cannot specify favicons using the second method if they cannot write to the server root. However, they can use method one to specify a favicon since it is more flexible and does not constrain the site manager to use a single favicon at a single place on the site. There are a few other well-known encroachments on URI space, including the "robots. Loosely speaking, a profile is a definition of set of terms.
Ideally, a profile includes both machine-readable information and human-readable information. Instead, the author can provide values according to need, and then use a profile to explain what the values mean. In our case, we have recommend that authors use the value "icon" and a profile that explains that "when we say icon, we mean 'this is a favicon.
There are several limitations to the approaches described above, including the preferred method which is why the TAG continues to work on the question:. The following QA Interest Group participants and W3C staff have contributed significantly to the content of this document: W3C liabilitytrademarkdocument use and software licensing rules apply. Your interactions with this site are in accordance with our public and Member privacy statements.
